Talk:Bay of Bengal
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bay of Bengal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adding some important information about sea ports
[edit]Dear editors, It will be more informative if we attach the list of all the sea ports located and active in the bay of Bengal. If we do this it will be more easy to know about this bay and subcontinent. So please, We should do it Mohammad Ali Rplsc (talk) 07:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Madras State?
[edit]'it's now part of India's Madras State '!. Are we making up states now? 73.46.159.225 (talk) 00:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Kalinga Sagar
[edit]Here it is written, in the classical India the Bay of Bengal was called Kalinga Sagar. But the sources of this information are not trustworthy. Because Mr. Mohanty gave his own opinion and also Bay of Bengal does not include only Kalinga region of India. So how can we say that? Kushdeep12 (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is cited to an article in the The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, a peer-reviewed journal. This is a top-tier source and attempts to remove it or tag it as unreliable are completely improper. MrOllie (talk) 16:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Already read the journal. This journal is just someone's opinion. He didn't mention it in which historical source it was written "Kalinga Sagar". The citation is not not trustworthy.And how did you know, it is a peer reviewed journal? Kushdeep12 (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- It clearly says so on the website of the journal as well as at the given jstor link. MrOllie (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Clearly says? It doesn't give any reference of historical books. It is just someone's research paper. Kushdeep12 (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- We do not require peer-reviewed sources to meet your personal standards, only those of the journal's editors and reviewers. MrOllie (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Then why are you replying? Did I ask you to reply? Or I can't write anything in talk page. Even I can give a valuable source. Kushdeep12 (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- The purpose of the talk page is to discuss. Why did you post here if you don't want people to reply? MrOllie (talk) 17:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
That's why I posted; Group Discussion.But someone wrote "we don't need your..." so I can also write please don't reply. Kushdeep12 (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Geography
- C-Class vital articles in Geography
- C-Class India articles
- Top-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Top-importance
- C-Class Indian geography articles
- Top-importance Indian geography articles
- C-Class Indian geography articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject Indian geography articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class Bangladesh articles
- Top-importance Bangladesh articles
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles
- C-Class Indonesia articles
- Low-importance Indonesia articles
- WikiProject Indonesia articles
- C-Class Myanmar articles
- Low-importance Myanmar articles
- WikiProject Myanmar articles
- C-Class Oceans articles
- Low-importance Oceans articles
- WikiProject Oceans articles
- C-Class Sri Lanka articles
- High-importance Sri Lanka articles
- WikiProject Sri Lanka articles